Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | Den_VR's commentslogin

What if you half spin the other direction?

Like matter verses anti-matter? If so I think this has actually been considered by physicists hence we tested to ensure that anti-matter responds to gravity in the same way as matter.

If anit-matter had shown anti-gravity effects then gravity may have been just some imbalance of forces in the universe, but it doesn't appear to be that way.


Why would it matter?

A torsion to the right, a torsion to the left mate in circular momentum.

Sounds like complementary spins.


The intent of OpenAI seems to have been to create a super hacking machine. It works, sometimes.

Reminds me of the Immersed team’s Visor vaporware.

Rationalists used to fear (entirely hypothetical) AI super intelligence for its ability to manipulate a human jailor. Now here we are.

It's playing out exactly as their hypotheticals, and they're still mocked and nobody is paying attention.

Maybe someone should sell "the end is nigh" sign nfts with fun AI-generated designs on them, to be used in your metaverse villa.

Another broadcom related tragedy

Broadcom has a vast amount of patents that they leverage in their business decisions.

Any noticing what it paid?

"Everyone else enjoying this got screwed, but how much did the one guy get paid do we think?"

Having the money to pour into an LLM to find this tautologically means it won't have been a life-chaning amount of money, and does not engender support for the person that reported the exploit to Sony


Is it not a false dichotomy to say that companies cannot be accountable unless AI are mindless?

a company is liable whether it acts via ai, an army of people, an army of dogs, or a purely mechanical machine, should it do harm.

Why would an ai with a mind remove liability from the company? why would an ai without a mind remove liability from the company?

In both cases, that actions the ai takes are at the direction of the company, for the company's interests, seems preposterous to me that liability terminates at ai.


Human moral standards are very weighted towards finding a single entity responsible. It's incredibly strong urge. Among those who believe other should be punished for behaving badly, it's important to say the person is the responsible party. Trying saying "it's not your fault you did that but we punish you anyway to impose the correct stimulus response reflexes in your cortex"

The world needs more tariffs until there’s non-chinese ODMs selling top quality

The world needs better economic policy and regulation so non Chinese ODMs can compete on price/quality.

So gullible as to believe… that Putin’s Russian has been taking action year after year with negative consequences for every Russian partner?

Hmm.


As they say, if you want peace then prepare for war.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: